Last week I wrote about P!NG Coffee - a robotic coffee & beverage kiosk engineered by ex-Amazon, Ninja, and iRobot employees.

The novel concept can churn out 360 beverages an hour - with consistent flavor, no tipping, and no line.

I think the product idea is pretty great, but the investment thesis fell apart for me after crunching the unit economics and seeing how large their scale would need to be to reach profitability.

I estimated that based on their franchising model it would take 48 locations to reach $1M in sales, and hundreds more to achieve profitability.

Ultimately I gave P!NG the below rating of 4.8/10 and passed on the opportunity.

Overall CROWDSCALE Score:
4.8 / 10

I’ve been in communication with P!NG’s founder Rob Whitten and he requested to set the record straight on some of the assumptions put forth in my article.

To give his perspective the same publicity as the original article, I’m pasting his key callouts below.

from Rob Whitten, co-founder of P!NG…

1. Throughput and revenue assumptions
The model assumes ~100 drinks per day at ~$8 AOV (~$300K/year). In reality, ~100 drinks/day at ~$6 AOV is much closer to a breakeven level for us.

In testing, even during off-peak periods, we’re consistently seeing ~20–50 drinks over a two-hour window. That alone implies meaningfully higher daily throughput, especially with a 24/7 model and the ability to better capture peak-hour demand than traditional coffee shops.

Based on this, we believe ~300 drinks/day is a reasonable and conservative operating target.

2. Business model framing (most important)
The analysis treats p!ng as a traditional franchise generating ~7% of revenue. That’s not how we operate.

We are building a Hub & Spoke RaaS model where we retain substantially more of the economics and operate as a centralized network. Meaning we will handle all of the COGS, resupply and refilling of the pods, thus a majority operating income will flow through p!ng. Applying a traditional franchise royalty lens materially understates both margins and scalability.

3. Pod pricing strategy
The write-up assumes limited contribution from upfront pod payments. That is directionally true by design.

We intentionally keep pod markup modest to accelerate deployment and network density. The model is built to generate the majority of value from ongoing drink sales, not equipment margins.

4. Path to profitability
Because of the assumptions above, the conclusion that we would need hundreds of locations to reach profitability is not accurate.

Based on our actual model, we expect the company to reach profitability at roughly ~40 pods, not in the hundreds.

There you have it - Rob firmly believes that profitability can be achieved at ~40 locations, a far better scenario than what I had projected.

And that is a good reminder that these numbers are just that - projections. The great thing is we’ll be able to see where reality lies when they move on from their pilot program.

In the meantime, if Rob’s rebuttal has won you over and you want to check out P!NG for yourself I’ll link it below!

The defense sector's biggest reallocation in decades is underway. AI, space infrastructure, and advanced aerospace are capturing a growing share of procurement budgets. Our free report profiles the five companies investors should know now.

Get the report

Related Reads from CROWDSCALE